While I mostly go off about stupid things or regularly chronicle my mundane adventures, there are some topics that I'm very much wrestling with. One of them is an education class I'm currently in that I need in order to graduate. This class is disrupting my life because I find I am absolutely opposed to many of the basic, unspoken assumptions being taught. It's a two-part class, so I have another quarter to go, and I'm having to give myself pep talks
.
The biggest crisis facing string players is that the music we are immersed in is generally seen as obsolete and boring. Classical music concerts don't sell out stadiums and plenty of fabulous classically-trained musicians don't have places to play. I firmly believe it's because of the elitist culture that goes along with classical music. You can trace the increasing snobbery over the past few centuries. You don't see audience members at rock concerts looking over the tab sheet and pointing out mistakes to other audience members...but you can see that at a classical concert. So the ticket prices rise, and fewer and fewer people are willing to spend $60 for “obsolete” music.
Add to the mix that playing a stringed instrument is not a cheap hobby. Low-quality cellos usually start at $800, a set of decent strings costs about $150 (and you're ideally supposed to change them twice a year), plus when you ding the instrument, it costs big money to fix.
When I started the education class on how to teach the Suzuki method, the very first thing that came to mind is that this method is designed with a very specific client in mind. And from my years at Naropa, I learned that specific client has a lot of baggage (and a lot to answer for). The specific client is called privilege.
When a parent spends $75 each week for a half hour lesson and $300 for bi-monthly group lessons for their pre-school kid to learn a stringed instrument, and has enough time to sit in all the lessons, learn the instrument as well!, and practice sessions with that kid, this is privilege. Single parents, and/or people who work multiple jobs each week don't have the monetary or time resources available to get Suzuki lessons for their three-year-old. And in the Suzuki world, that makes you a shitty parent and your child will be forever doomed to being a second-tier musician at best.
This would be all fine and dandy and just a footnote in history except that a lot of people are teaching this method as the only way to teach strings. A lot of other types of pedagogy classes aren't offered regularly because there simply is no demand for them from students. And so we are moving forward with a method of string education that makes an already elitist type of music even more inaccessible to the average person.
It could be that I'm misunderstanding the basic concepts, but these are the unspoken assumptions that are not being discussed. Or it could be a generational thing. I'm at the butt-end of Generation X. I'm part of the herd that went through school budget cuts and basically being encouraged from all sides that if I wanted to learn something, I should figure out how to learn it since it probably wasn't going to be offered through school. Now there's helicopter parents who plan out every minute of the day with an eye towards college applications, and yes, to me it is creepy (not inspiring) to watch a three-year-old play violin. I question the parent's motives. It's one thing if little Timmy honestly loves playing...that's awesome and I'm glad there are teachers out there for him. But for the others, I worry. And I know there are folks who would disagree with me.
All I know is that there are students out there who love to play cello and already can't afford regular, let alone Suzuki, lessons. I've participated in giving free lessons to middle-school cellists whose parents couldn't pay and who seriously didn't have the time to be present at the lesson. Instead of giving up the case, I treated the 12-year-old public school trained cellist (which is NOT the “greatest tragedy ever,” by the way) like an adult and expected her to work on her own on the things we covered in lessons...and she did.
I agree that anyone can learn to play music, but I really have a problem with excluding people based on their level of finances. The more diversity that can be brought to the string player world, the better off we'll be in the long run. So for the next quarter and a half, I'll be picking up the tricks to amuse 3-5 year olds and will take them with me when I work with students who are older and whose parents are more like the parents that I know.
/end rant
An Erinku:
ranting
it's what's for dinner
after the
pasta's gone